Rigorous spatial methods without writing the pipeline.
Run Local Cluster Analysis and geographically weighted regression on public county data, then share a read-only project with co-authors (they need Vesta accounts) or export the results and a report for the manuscript.

Building a spatial pipeline in R or Python takes weeks, and hand-off to students or co-authors is fragile.
How much of the county variation in diagnosed diabetes does poverty explain, and where do high rates cluster?
- Start from the counties3,109 counties with diagnosed diabetes (CDC PLACES, 2024 release) and poverty (ACS 2022), on one county layer.How to: Data Library
- Test the clustersLocal Moran's I with queen contiguity, 999 permutations, a false discovery rate of 0.05 and seed 2026: global I is 0.625, with 357 High-High counties and 389 Low-Low.How to: Local cluster analysis
- Fit the poverty effectGWR of diabetes on poverty: global R-squared 0.753, local R-squared from 0.06 to 0.96, and a residual Moran's I of 0.009.How to: Regression and GWR
Diabetes clusters across the South (357 High-High counties), with 389 Low-Low counties. The local poverty slope runs from about −0.35 to 0.66 points of diabetes per point of poverty, steepest across much of the Southeast.
Both variables are estimates, not counts: PLACES is model-based and the ACS is a sample survey. The clusters show where groups sit, not why.
